Duplicating
Dr. Rife's Cancer Treatment Success
By
James
E. Bare, D.C.
August
2026
It
is unfortunate that Dr. Rife's results with cancer treatment cannot be fully
duplicated today. In our present era, the use of frequencies to treat
cancer is becoming ever more common . Unfortunately, results and treatment
outcomes can vary significantly . Sometimes there is a remarkable response,
sometimes there is no response, and all to often, there is a partial response.
Regardless of degree, responses can be temporary - a remission .
I have been focused upon trying to solve this enigma for over 30 years .
A lot of time has been spent sorting out the urban legends and misinformation
that abounds about Rife's results with cancer. What I have found is that the
solution to achieving Dr. Rife's results lies not just in the device or it's
frequency range capability. These qualities are highly important, but are not
the full solution. Modern
plasma based frequency instruments have proven their efficacy over the decades.
Devices are tools that can enhance effects and outcomes,
and initiate the process of cancer cell death. Yes, for a
variety of reasons, some are better at this than others, but those
reasons are beyond the scope of this document.
Before we are able to achieve Dr. Rife's level of treatment success,
there are remaining mysteries that need to be
solved . Recently, I've come
to a much greater understanding of Dr. Rife's treatment method and the
mechanisms involved. From that
understanding , the limitations we presently have that need to be overcome
become obvious. This also has opened a door to a potential work around that may
achieve close to the same level of effectivness.
The following information discusses Dr. Rife's methods, and provides
insights into the incredible results achieved by Dr. Rife.
One
portion of Dr. Rife's results with cancer came from eliminating the infectious
bacillus component ( BX or BY) he discovered .
Dr. Rife focused not upon treating cancer, but rather destroying the
organism he felt caused cancer using that organisms MOR. But, we now know,
several different micro organisms and viruses are linked to the origin and or
maintenance of many cancers, not just Rifes' BX or BY. Some viruses and micro
organisms are cofactors in the origin of cancers. Others don't cause cancer, but
activate processes within cancer cells that keep them growing and help to
provide protective mechanisms. In other words if a person has a cancer type known to
be associated with certain micro organisms,
then in order to assist in the replication of Dr. Rife's effects,
it would be prudent to use frequencies
for those microorganisms and not just for BX or BY.
Another
portion of Dr. Rife's results, is based upon induction of irreversible cell
death mechanisms/cascades which I
mentioned in an earlier posting . Treatment with his BX or BY MOR frequency,
initiated a cell death mechanism. Dr. Rifes 1934 device trials had a 100%
response rate, and all 16 patients were pronounced cured based upon the
diagnostic criteria of the day. These days, the terms used are " complete
response to treatment" and "remission" .
One
has to remember that this was the 1930's, a time where there were some basic
blood tests, X-rays, and physical diagnosis to determine response to treatment.
There were no CAT, MRI, or Scintillation scans. There were none of the highly
sensitive blood tests that are now available.
Dr.
Rife's protocol was to do a very short exposure of just three minutes,
and then do another exposure in two days . Somehow, within those three minutes of frequency treatment,
programmed cell death mechanisms were activated, and cells died. Novocure
has definitely proven that cancer cell death mechanisms occur from application
of their Tumor Treatment (TT) fields. Modern devices ( including Novocure's)
however take much longer to create activation of cell death mechanisms.
Typically hours, of exposure are
required. When doing laboratory testing, Novocure prevents cell repair
mechanisms from being able to salvage a damaged cancer cell
by applying their device 24 hours every day for 3 to five days. Their
patients are encouraged to use their device
for as many hours a day as possible. Another way to look at this method is that
when the cells are damaged by a frequency treatment, Novocure isn't allowing the
cells to recover by taking a long pause between each treatment. 3 days is 72 hours, and that is
4320 minutes, a long way from the 6 minutes exposure as done by Dr. Rife over
the same time period !
Multiple
papers that our research group have written, report on the cell killing effects
of OPEF ( Oscillating Pulsed Electric Fields ) using 10 to 12 hour long
exposures. As this testing is invitro ( culture plate), there is no immune
system present that would otherwise attack damaged cancer cells.
The influence of the immune system should not be ignored in actual invivo
treatment outcomes ! Part of the proposed work around process specifically
enlists the immune system !
People
tend not to use such prolonged exposure sessions when doing self treatment. An
hour or two at one session is typical. Yet, many still improve using much
shorter treatment times. To me that means that a significant amount of cancer
cell damage occurs during each self treatment, and some of the cells are
completing their death process. By
doing daily exposures, the cells
that did not die from the previous exposure do not have a chance to fully
recover.
Besides
the patients immune systems, assisting in the patients treatment response,
I do believe Dr. Rife's
results came from some additional feature of the applied
frequency. A feature such as mixing of frequencies, gating, creation of
beat frequencies, or a
combination of all of these. The output signal of Dr. Rifes instrument enhanced
the initiation of cell death mechanisms that would occur from just a 3 minute
exposure. This topic is presently
being explored by Dan Jensen using Dr.
Rife's original Kennedy receiver components.
Dr. Anthony Holland has developed a method of simultaneous multiple
frequency generation known as “Destructive
Cancer Resonant Frequency Formant " ( DCRFF) . DCRFF
has shown significantly enhanced cell killing effects when compared to the use of a single frequency upon leukemia
cells. This is reported upon in the linked paper. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202305.2053
The
cancer killing effects originated by Dr. Rife and his device,
have definitely been proven to exist.
The evidence is overwhelming that treatment with specific frequencies,
and EM fields of adequate strength, can kill cancer cells. In fact the FDA has
approved two devices I know of , the
Novocure - "Optune" and the Therabionics "P1".
Society continues to suffer from the ravages of cancer through the
disregard of this reality. It's
active suppression, is the safe haven domain of the scientific Luddites who
refuse to acknowledge or fund research into these effects.
Sequential
treatments by Dr. Rife were somehow able to avoid development of permanent cell
protection and treatment resistance mechanisms.
I don't care how the cells died, I do know the cancer cells died using
one or more of
the 5 genetically pre programed cell death mechanisms. These are apoptosis,
necroptosis, ferroptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis.
The treatment process took 90 days for most of the group
to be declared as "cured" and 120 days for all of the group of
patients to be declared as "cured". Looked at another way , 40 to 53
exposure treatments were required. Each
exposure treatment produced a roughly 2.25% reduction in the number of cancer
cells by the time of the next exposure.
A
single exposure was not a " knock out punch", and for some reason, was
not intended to be. Response to each short treatment was gradual and measured.
X-rays were used to treat cancer in Dr. Rife's time, and treatment
resistance of cancer cells to X-rays following initial treatment was well known
. Perhaps this acquired resistance effect had something to do with the protocol
that was used ? There are obvious questions as to why the exposure was kept so
short, and why exposures were done every 48 hours. What is known, is that this
treatment regimen was effective.
What
occurred after each exposure required several events; 1. that cancer cells died,
2. that cell division was slowed or inhibited in some manner, 3. that
there always were fewer cancer cells present at the next exposure than the one
prior, and 4. treatment resistance mechanisms were not activated. Some understanding - cancer cells tend to divide on an
average of 48 hours. Exposures were every 48 hours. One can see how it would be
possible to have continued cell/tumor growth with this time duration between
treatments. Many of the cells
killed by the exposure would be
replaced, and most likely more
cells than originally present would grow. But that did not occur ! There was a
continuous, roughly 2.5% reduction
in cancer cells from one exposure to the next.
It
is important to raise this question " Did the cancer cells die simply
because the bacillus Rife targeted was destroyed, or did this happen because the
cancer cells were damaged by his applied frequency field for the bacillus ? Most
likely, Dr. Rife's results were a consequence of both actions.
One
aspect that is often overlooked, is what happened long term to the patients that
were treated? Turns out, the issue
of an incomplete cancer cell death process did affect Dr. Rife's long term
results in the famous 1934 device trials. To quote " We
also know that there was possibly two of those cancer patients who came back to
Dr. Johnson with a recurrence of their cancer. " https://rifevideos.com/the_1934_cancer_and_tuberculosis_clinic.html
"
This
information is highly important, as it seems Dr. Rife was able to eliminate
enough cancer cells to obtain a "cure" for the standards of his day,
and not all the patients relapsed. Based upon available information, the
majority in fact did not relapse ! For some reason, his treatment was not
permanently activating cyto protective mechanisms including treatment resistance
in the cancer cells that were not eliminated by his treatment. Was this due to
the short exposure time of just 3 minutes combined with 2 days between
treatments?
Cancer
cells have enhanced DNA repair mechanisms as compared to normal cells. This
especially so , within cancer stem cells. Besides the repair mechanisms, that
are activated in response to attempts to kill cancer cells, also activated, are
treatment resistance mechanisms. In cancer stem cells, and surviving regular cancer cells,
this activation is responsible for cancer tumor reoccurrence,
metastatic tumor spread, and treatment resistance. Worst of all, in
response to repeated attacks such as from chemotherapy and radiation , and yes,
even from frequencies, cancer cells
undergo genetic alterations that
makes the resistance mechanisms permanent.
Their resistance and repair mechanisms do not turn off,
and it becomes extremely difficult, if not impossible, to kill these
cancer cells .
Here
then are some of the critical questions and issues that needs solving so that we
can obtain and then hopefully exceed Dr. Rife's results .
1.
How does one activate Cell Death mechanisms using a RF initiated plasma with
just three minutes of exposure ?
2.
What is the role of frequencies and frequency ranges in response ?
This would include testing for effects using mixed types of frequencies
in cell death initiation ? Dr. Rife used MHz level frequencies, TT field
frequencies are in the 100Khz to 400 Khz regions, our research group is using
from 80 to 200 Khz presently, Therabionics utilizes audio range frequencies for
cancer treatment.
3.
Does such cell death mechanism activation continue so the cells die ?
4.
Does growth inhibition occur ?
5.
How does elimination of any infectious component affecting cancer cell growth
and replication affect the cells ?
6.
The total number of cells present in 48 hours needs to be lower than that
of 48 hours prior.
7.
There needs to be continued reduction
of cancer cell numbers, shrinkage of tumors, and a near total response to
treatment over 90 to 120 days of
continued treatment
8.
What must be done to assure cancer cells do not activate repair/develop
resistance mechanisms, survive each treatment,
and continue to replicate after 90 to 120 days ?
9.
What must be done to prevent genetic alteration so that the cancer cells do not
develop permanent cytoprotective and treatment resistance mechanisms resulting
in permanent treatment resistance ?
10.
What happens with just 3 minutes of exposure time ? Can this be replicated?
Presently
the answers to these questions and many others require laboratory research. I
would estimate that a funded lab with a few scientists working in it could have
answers to many of these questions inside of 6 months, and all of them within 18
months. Perhaps 2 million dollars to buy equipment, pay salaries and overhead,
and then recreate the treatment outcomes from nearly a century ago.
Trying to do this work at an existing lab or higher education institution would
be a fools errand. Far to many
conflicts of interest are found within the status quo.
Careers are at stake, political alignments exist, sensitive ego's are
everywhere, and gigantic amounts of
money are on the line. Recreating
Dr. Rife's effective outcomes would destroy the status quo.
The total summation of the changes which would ensue would potentially
place the lives of such researchers in jeopardy . The lab would have to be
created from scratch using private funding.
But that isn't going to happen anytime soon.......
There
is a way to around this conundrum - we, that is, those of us within the
frequency device community must solve the problem ourselves.
Either with crowd funded labs, or
with empirical reported results for feedback. The
solution to cancer and
replication of Dr. Rife's results, will never originate from some main stream
research laboratory, a pharmaceutical company,
or school of higher education. They have had over 90 some years now to do
this, and they have not, and will
not do this.
Certainly
Dr. Rife did not know the answers. He just had a method that worked!
A method of treatment that circumvented all the issues we presently are
trying to work with . I believe it is possible
to use a "work around" to obtain improved treatment outcomes
without directly knowing the answer of the unknowns surrounding Dr. Rife's
results ! A nontoxic based protocol is all
that is required. Cumulatively the
number of ways this proposed protocol affects cancer cells is superior to that
of Dr. Rife. But, the outcomes from this theorized protocol may or may not equal
those of Dr. Rife. I am
hopeful that the outcomes from his
combined series of effects will result in consistent and reliable positive
outcomes . The protocol is driven
by the use of frequency devices , and outcomes could be
better than any so far obtained by any other existing method.
To
protect myself : - the basic
theorized protocol is a combination of existing known mechanisms and protocols
that kill cancer cells, and that people are presently using. It is the emitted
field of a frequency device, that will bind the mechanisms of these protocols
together, and provide the proof of
my theory. I must repeat - this is
just a theoretical protocol. I am not diagnosing , treating , or actively
encouraging those with cancer to utilize this method. This information is for
educational purposes only.
As
part of this theoretical protocol, it will be necessary that one have the
medications already in their blood stream prior to using their frequency device.
People are already using these products and methods to treat cancers. But
they are not combined, and used individually. It is the synergistic combination
of the protocols which is all important.
Necessary
components of my Treatment Theory:
1.
A Frequency Device
with adequate field strength and frequency range capability to initiate cell
death mechanisms and open pores in the cancer cells that allows for significant
improved intake of the medications . Novocure research has shown pores will open
within cancer cells with fields as low as 1.5V/cm or 150 V per meter. These
pores all the ingress of the assisting medications into the cancer cell. Inhibition of mitotic spindle formation happens at 2.5 to 4 V
per cm. Disrupting mitosis leads to failure to divide and cell death mechanisms
being activated. These are not high
field strength values. There are
many devices which will easily provide these field strength levels.
Some of the devices are: Plasma Sonics - PGM-1 and PGM-2, Resonant Light
PERL, GB-4000+MOPA, BCX, Hartwell DBx2 SSQ, True Rife, EMEM variants,
and others.
Here
is a link to a paper on low voltage pore formation and enhanced medication
uptake from late 2025 ( if using an anti tracker - it will need to be disabled)
: https://aacrjournals.org/mct/article/24/11/1815/766858/Cancer-Cell-Permeability-Induced-by-Tumor-Treating
Besides
pore formation and enhanced drug uptake , EM Fields have been shown to :
A.
Distrupt the process of mitosis by upsetting spindle microtubule formation.
B.
Cause Microtubule fragmentation during mitosis
C.
Hinder DNA damage repair
D.
Reduced metastasis - damage cell cytoskeleton
E.
Activate autophagy and cell apoptois mechanisms.
2.
Repurposed Anthelmentics protocols.
People are using combinations of Ivermectin with Fenbendazole,
Ivermectin with mebendazole.
The results of studies using these products to kill cancer cells are quite
positive and the internet is flooded with empirical outcome reports and
suggested protocols for their use. All of these products need fat to be
absorbed. Taken without fat - the absorption is miniscule and so are effects!
Typically it takes 6 months, or perhaps more, for significant effects to
result from taking these medications. Protocols
are found on the web.
Mebendazole
:
A.
Inhibits microtubule polymerization during mitosis halting cell division
B.
Switches macrophages cells into a cancer killing state , and activates T cells.
C. Induces DNA damage and
autophagy
D. Inhibits enzymes that
allow for metastasis and limits spread of cancer to organs.
E. Activates Apoptosis and
autophagy . Importantly ( referring to quercetin actions)
inhibiting autophagy greatly enhances pro apoptosis and growth inhibition
effects of Mebendazole.
Ivermectin :
A.
Distrupts mitochondrial function, which activates and enhances cell death
via apoptosis
B
Induces cell death via ferroptotis and autophagy.
C.
Interferes with oncogenic pathways which leads to caspase activation -
which then leads to apoptotis and cell death.
D.
"Decloakes" cancer cells from immune system allowing for immunogenic
cell death - promoting T cell
infiltration, and reverses multi drug resistance mechanisms.
Fenbendazole:
A.
Inhibits microtubule formation in mitosis, arrests mitosis, and this causes
mitotic catastrophe.
B.
Interferes with cancer cell enegy metabolism - inhibits glucose uptake
C.
Activates apoptosis , pyroptosis, autophagy, p53 activation, and induces
oxidative stress
D.
Reduced angiogenesis - required for tumor growth
3.
Quercetin : One must use Quercetin Phytosome with Bromelain for optimal
absorption. Otherwise only about 17% of dose is absorbed. 500mg to 1000 mg/day
is typical dose.
A. Is a radiosensitizer - Term
applied to ionizing radiation, these are also RF waves - just significantly higher
in frequency. Radioprotects normal
cells from damage.
B.
Inhibits DNA damage repair pathways.
C.
Activates and stabilizes p53 and through
this creates Apoptosis
D.
Activates mitochondrial based
apoptosis.
E.
Inhibits metastasis, tumor invasion, and tumor proliferation.
F.
Potentiates the effects of
anticancer drugs
G.
Inhibits angiogenesis
H.
Low
doses of quercetin specifically inhibit cancer cell proliferation by inducing G1
phase cell cycle arrest, often via the upregulation of the p21 CDK
I.
Activates caspases 3-8-9 based apoptosis and
promotes autophagy.
J.
Slows tumor growth.
4.
Treatment with known frequencies typically used to treat cancer. TT fields, Dr
Rife's, public domain, and so on. Frequencies
derived via the method developed and patented by Charlene Boehm.
Frequencies for infectious organisms associated with come cancers - example
Epstein Barr Virus, HPV, HERV, HHV, MMTV, and so on. Just do a search for a
particular cancer type of interest and see if there are viral or other
infectious components to it's origin. Example " Breast Cancer Viral
Links" .
Charlene
Boehm's theorem can be used to calculate frequencies the could be used to
reactivate various Tumor Suppressor genes that are turned off . These are not
mutated genes, they are just turned off or inhibited in cancer cells.
These genes need to be turned back on.
One
can also use RRM frequencies from Dr. Irina Cosic's theories
Some important Cancer Suppressor
Genes and their frequencies
It is important that one check
the action of these genes in the particular cancer type they are trying to work
with. Some have very low presence, others can be close to 80%. Formula used is from Ms. Boehm's patent
4526016.44/BP# = hz. One can set the frequency range by multiplying by 2 to
create octave harmonics. Use - 2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512 and so on ( 2^n )
this has been done for p53 as an example.
p53
Gene, a major gene turned off in
50% of all cancers
20000bp
= 452.601 hz 57933.010
hz 1853856.33 hz 3707712.66 hz
19143
bp = 472.863 hz 60526.574.hz
1936850.37 hz 3873700.74 hz
25760
bp = 702.797 hz
44979.045 hz 1439329.45 hz
2878658.903 hz
PTEN
Gene On average this gene is turned off in 13.5 % of all cancers. Is turned off
in 65% of glioblastomas however.
100293
bp =722.04 hz
CDKN2A
Gene second most common gene turned off in cancers - about 30% - 40% of all
cancers have this turned off .
is
turned
27550
bp = 657.1348 hz
23329
bp = 776.03 hz
27573
bp = 656.5867 hz
CDKN
Gene
10870
bp = 832.7537 hz
10957
bp = 826.141 hz
CDKN1B
( A.K.A. p27)
37876
bp = 955.96 hz
CDKN1C
2669
bp = 1699.77 hz
2563
Bp = 1765.905 hz
p21
Gene
10879
Bp = 832.064 hz
PTCH1
Gene - inhibited in 50% of basal cell carcinomas ( most common skin cancer)
74078
Bp = 977.5677
RBL2
Gene
57178
bp =633.252 hz
57673
bp = 627.8177hz
55744
bp = 649.543 hz
RBL1 Gene
99647
bp = 726.27 hz
100,000
bp = 724.162 hz
All
of the medications are non toxic in regularly used dose levels, and frequency
therapies have are almost no side effects.
Combined
these methods create ( and this is not a complete list ) :
A.
Disruption of Cancer Cell division - mitotic catastrophe occurs only in cancer
cells with this protocol ! ( some common chemo drugs induce this - but damage
normal cells as well )
B.
Activation of Several different avenues of cell death without affecting normal
healthy cells.
C.
Inhibition of cancer cell growth, invasiveness,
and metastasis without the toxicity shown with chemotherapy drugs.
D.
Activation of the immune system against cancer without damage to the immune
system. Chemotherapy drugs often cause severe immune system damage.
E.
Metabolic energy inhibitions (a common mode of action for many chemotherapy
drugs ) affect only cancer cells, not normal cells.
Chemotherapy being non selective affects normal cells.
It is why people using ivermectin/mebendazole, fenbendazole or using
frequency devices do not lose their hair !
F.
Tumor suppressor gene activation
G.
The protocol is essentially non toxic. Billions
of doses of ivermectin/fenbendazole/ mebendazole have been taken over the
decades with minimal intolerance issues. The
extremely toxic and damaging side effects common to chemotherapy are not
present and avoided.
There
are other anthelmentics that might be
considered besides the three mentioned above. Some may eventually prove to provide superior effects with my
proposed cancer treatment theory.
Here are the lists of anthelmentics either in clinical trial for cancer treatment or have shown anti cancer effects in the lab :
Anthelmintics undergoing clinical trials:
Albendazole
Ivermectin
Levamisole
Mebendazole
Niclosamide
Anthelmintics having shown promising anti-cancer effects in the lab:
Flubendazole
Rafoxanide
Nitazoxanide
Praziquantel
It is my hope that this protocol will offer great benefit and just perhaps achieve close to the results of those obtained by Dr. Rife.
James
E. Bare, D.C.
August
2026